- Creating secular
Bhikkhu Bodhi faces a great divide
Prominent U.S. Pali translator contrasts 'Classical' and 'Secular' Buddhisms
A fruitful start for meaningful discussion perhaps?Find it here
Login StatusYou are not logged in.
In This Momentan occasional newsletter
Seeking your generosity
If you find inspiration and sustenance in this website and would like to help secular dharma practice communities develop, and grow, do please offer your support
A MONTHLY DONATION
- Somewhere between a flat white and a good meal perhaps
A ONE-TIME DONATION
- You can also support us with a one-time donation through PayPal
OR BY BANK TRANSFER
- Go to the Generosity page to find out how to do this
Translate this page
Search this site
Tag Archives for article
When I was studying at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London many years ago, my supervisor once accused me, during discussion of a text by the early Buddhist writer Nagarjuna, of being ‘obsessed with emptiness’.
‘The contrast between Classical Buddhism and Secular Buddhism stems primarily from different ways of understanding the human condition,’ writes Pali translator Bhikkhu Bodhi in this article from the U.S. magazine Inquiring Mind.
A reflection on human relationality and why it is important, I’d argue essential, as a core consideration of the emergent notion of secular Buddhism. It does not enter the usual arena of this inquiry: rebirth, the validity of the discourses, and so on. Where it does answer will, I trust, speak for itself.
From time to time I’ve heard participants at retreats etc mention the reason they want to learn meditation is to reduce/manage their anxiety [a couple of my friends dabbled in meditation (they never really became meditators) because they hoped meditating would reduce their anxiety – it didn’t and they no longer meditate].